Independent market analysis
Long-form research on portfolio construction, risk, macro and the tools that actually move returns. No hype, no tips, no paywall.
We tested the 35 largest active ETFs against the index ETF in their own category: 21 of 33 were ahead over three years, but only 1 of 6 in US large blend, and switching to another reasonable benchmark reversed 4 of 15 verdicts. Active ETFs beat active mutual funds mainly by charging less.
From July 1927 to September 2026 the highest-yielding 30% of US stocks compounded at 11.34% a year against 10.26% for the market. Most of that edge is the value premium: after size and value, 0.21 points a year are left. The top 10% by yield did worse than the next two groups, with more risk.
Lula won Brazil’s runoff with 51.79%. By Monday morning Ibovespa futures fell as much as 19.85%, the dollar fixing rose 11% and B3 halted share trading.
US stocks split as Brent settled at $116.72 and AI financing costs came into focus, while PHP2Shell, a Node.js RCE and the eMudhra certificate compromise exposed another cost of the AI economy.
TRIX is the daily change of a price smoothed three times. On the S&P 500 since 1954, the 15-day TRIX lagged 21 trading days on average and crossed zero a third as often as a same-lag average, but no TRIX rule beat buy-and-hold on return, nor a same-exposure mix after 1992.
On the S&P 500 from 1954 to 2026, with costs and next-day execution, none of four common indicator rules or 90 variants of them beat buy-and-hold on return after 1992. MACD and TRIX lost to a same-exposure stock-and-bill mix in both periods; the 200-day average kept a better Sharpe ratio, not a return edge.
In the papers that made them famous, risk parity beat 60/40 and volatility timing raised the market's Sharpe ratio by a quarter. From 1965 to 2026, risk parity trailed 60/40 (Sharpe 0.35 against 0.45) and lost 28% in 2022. Volatility targeting cut the 2007–09 loss from 50% to 30%, but its Sharpe gain did not last.
Since 1953 the 10-year minus 3-month Treasury spread has inverted nine times. Seven inversions were followed by a recession 5 to 16 months later. Two were not: 1966, and the record 2022–2024 inversion, which has not been followed by a recession the NBER has dated. The signal says little about timing, and less about stocks.
From 1928 to 2025 the S&P 500 averaged 11.85% a year but compounded at 10.02%. The gap, roughly half the variance of returns, is volatility drag. It is why about two in three simulated 30-year histories fall short of an average-return projection, and why a simulated 3x daily fund lost 52% from 2000 to 2007 while the index gained 12%.
A 10-month moving-average rule on the S&P 500 returned 10.3% a year since 1934 against 11.2% for buy-and-hold, but its worst fall was 26% instead of 51%. It beat holding in only 21 of 92 years, and three-quarters of its exits were followed by a re-entry at a higher price.
